Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Leolo. 1992
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20fb6/20fb6aec42a8975ed4289fb13e95091a6c1fe794" alt=""
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Century of the Child: Growing by Design, 1900–2000. The Museum Of Modern Art
I
really enjoyed this exhibition and seeing it at a member’s only showing without
the hoards helped. But that being said I do have my reservations. This being a
typical Moma “historical” show it looks great as it sprawls its way through
those large galleries on the 6th floor. The exhibit documents how
children around the world played and learned from 1900 to 2000. However this
being the Museum Of Modern Art the work is geared to modernism and “good”
design, so I found it to be somewhat narrow and elitist in its approach and
curatorial decisions. Don’t get me wrong I love Lyonel Feininger’s wooden toys
as much as the next artist, and there are many beautiful examples of other
toys, books, furniture and games by other artists, architects and designers but
it helps if one keeps in mind that this is a show for MOMA’s kinder and not for
mommy’s kids. So everything in the show is beautiful and well designed, after
all we know that children only like beautiful and well-designed toys. There is
a nod to the commercial toy which includes colorforms (loved those colorforms
as a kid), Etch A Sketch (loved my Etch A Sketch, but its too much in the news
these days), Lego and slinky but not a can of Play Doh is to be found, nor are
marbles, pick up sticks, Jacks or any toy that one could have purchased at a
Woolworth’s. Most of the toys and games look like they were expensive even when
new, and now they look like the toys that sometimes turn up on Antiques Road
show, you know those great tin cars in their original boxes which is also
represented in the show. But where are the Lionel Train sets, the Lincoln Logs
(the only building block set that turns up is of course very Bauhausy even
though it’s from the 1950’s) or a View
Master (would it have killed them to include a View Master?), and not one doll.
The Moma’s idea of a doll is some of Sophie Taeuber-Arp’s wonderful puppets.
There is not one toy from the Disney Empire, in fact there are no movie or TV
tie-in games at all. There is not a ball, or a cheap beach toy either; in fact
games and toys of the streets are completely left out. Like many of these
historical shows, by the time you get to the final galleries, it’s a big
downer, I mean why would the curators devoted an entire wall pasted with pages
from The Whole Earth Catalog along with a poster of the Mai Lai massacre. Is
this to point out and educate us that our childhoods came to an end with the
60’s? How many small kids are going to have nightmares after viewing that
shocking poster, one woman standing next to me looked visibly upset and
ironically it’s the one image from this exhibition on childhood that stays with
me, its the image that I took home with me. Sure there are other political
images and objects throughout the show. There are some charming Nazi and
Italian Fascist board games (in mint condition I might add), that made me a
little queasy and uncomfortable, but the Moma’s nod to the holocaust and its
children is faint and is pretty much inconsequential consisting of a propaganda
film that the Nazi’s produced to show the world how marvelous the concentration
camp at Terezin was. There are no coloring books nor paper dolls and no Mr. And
Mrs. Potato Head, now that omission really upset me. There are also toys of the
space age, and stuff from Pee-Wee’s Playhouse but the newest toys and games
look so uninviting to me, that I thought to myself what kid would want to play
with them, I certainly wouldn’t and do we really need a wall featuring a boring
photograph by Andreas Gurksy of an ugly suburban Toy’s “R” Us, oh wait of
course its in their collection. Also when you exit through the gift shop you
will be able to pick up nice reproductions of some of the toys and books
featured in the exhibition which makes me wonder what came first the
chicken or the exhibition.
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Anatomy of a Murder 1959
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38903/3890311c1c539bb631efff1963bb049bfb4d3ddb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1850f/1850f66771a9b363c271effaec3486ba413a885f" alt=""
Monday, July 23, 2012
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Yayoi Kusama
Went
up to the Whitney Museum today (thankfully the terrible heat wave broke) to see the Yayoi Kusama show which was pretty much
marvelous. I especially liked seeing her early work, the paintings and
drawings. Her Phallic sculptures or accumulations as she calls them were
not my favorites, even though they have
a tacky look and feel to them. She is certainly a unique presence and I
applaud the Whitney for mounting this show. I could do without the
Sharon Hayes exhibit highlighting her sense of political correctness and
concern. Good for her, but look I'm just not into the idea of looking
at lots of colorful political flyers on a wall or hundreds of political
and cultural spoken word record albums also lining walls, And the
centerpiece of lots of political signs and placards all in a group is
strictly graduate school stuff. The smell of all the plywood used in
this "show" was nice though. I also liked (what's not to like as my
mother use to say) The Signs and Symbols show that is a beautifully
installed exhibit of lots of beautiful paintings from their collection,
its not the kind of show that is going to send you home thinking, but it
did make me swoon a bit and made my knees a little weak.
http://whitney.org/Exhibitions/YayoiKusama
http://whitney.org/Exhibitions/YayoiKusama
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0e01/c0e01a6ef27e460ce09bc4c1ee27050bcc8f9634" alt=""
Whitney Museum of American Art: Yayoi Kusama
whitney.org
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Liberal Limericks of 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13487/134870f0efce978f141985abd63bee27cb5a2c7f" alt="Liberal Limericks of 2012"
The poet Paul Dickey has just published his liberal limericks of 2012 for Kindle. The cover design is by me which I did in 1968, when I was I guess around 20 years old. "Ira Joel Haber is so annoyingly talented"-Angela Bartolone.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008MP9POM
Monday, July 16, 2012
The Glass Coin
The Glass Coin has just posted 6 of my notebook drawings. You can view them at this link.
http://theglasscoin.com/art-by-ira-joel-haber/
http://theglasscoin.com/art-by-ira-joel-haber/
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Friday, July 13, 2012
The Stranger. 1946
Spoilers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f8b/51f8b7ff34bcbcdaf632333025ac96fd0d4fb9a4" alt=""
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Sudden Fear 1952
If
you can accept the premise of Joan Crawford as a very successful and rich
playwright and Jack Palance as a romantic lead, then you should be able to
enjoy this twisty but somewhat ludicrous femme jep movie from the early 50’s.
Joan who was 47 at the time and approaching her gorgon period plays as I said a
hot playwright who is also an heiress with a large home in San Francisco where
most of the movie takes place. The film opens with a rehearsal of her new play
in New York, with Jack Palance playing the lead. Joan has qualms about him not
being romantic enough (read handsome) to play the part and has him fired. So of course on the cross country train ride
that Joan is taking back home to San Francisco after the play opens to smash
reviews, who should also be on the train but none other than Jack. Joan is all so
sorry for firing him, and before you know it they’re playing poker and having
breakfast as the train speeds on to the city by the bay. Well Joan of course
falls madly in love with Jack and soon they’re in montages taking in the
sights, and dining and dancing in all the hot spots. And then they get married and its darling
this and darling that until Joan discovers by accident a devious plot Jack is
hatching with his old girlfriend played with hellish relish by Gloria Grahame,
all blonde and bad. Joan who has had many moments of over the top acting in her
career really soars in this one and I swear at one point I thought her eyes
were going to pop out of her head. Palance
who excelled at playing villains throughout his long career simply gives away
the show by being well Jack Palance. What with his unattractive face that looks
like a cubist portrait with mud thrown on it, or a bruised boxer’s mug, and in
fact one of his famous roles was as the battered fighter in “Requiem For A
Heavyweight” that he did on Playhouse 90 in 1956 andh e does have a down and
dirty animal magnetism that works well in his scenes with Grahame (kiss me,
kiss me hard she moans to Palance). The
film is a bit slow and tedious in parts, because there’s so much plot but the
last hour is good and goosy with a beautifully done if improbable ending.
Smoothly directed by David Miller who began his career directing sports shorts
like “Table Tennis”, “Hurling,” “Racing Canines”, and “Aquatic Artistry” and went
on to direct feature films most notably “Lonely Are The Brave” in 1962.
With a good thumping score by Elmer Bernstein, and cinematography by the great
Charles Lang who received an Oscar nomination for his work. Also Oscar nominations for costume, Actress
and supporting actor. Surprisingly considering that this is a Kino
release both the sound and the transfer leave much to be desired.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Art Of Another Kind
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d8a/03d8a8193e1746b643ae318dddbed27f76a35c73" alt=""
http://www.guggenheim.org/new-york/exhibitions/on-view/art-of-another-kind