![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLr-xRvzdxIneKQ6QfEGqYMwujTljs__NppWlXYu_XZLDKOZRp80VV5CipL-ZFAUnC03SEHkoqbtyrXyMhUskQqChTedCQtUgM-MEAg9KFBJiz_0vvhqVOM0ELNYu4MFlC1fF2sw/s1600/9350_MJ+14748_CROP.jpg)
How perfect that
this artist is named Merlin for he casts a wide and magical spell in his
latest show of perfectly scaled paintings that for the most part are
abstract but have dollops of landscapes, figures (including some erotic
ones) and oddly shaped canvases. Yes these are magical and subtle and
seductive little darlings that are mouth watering in their casualness,
colors and markings. In some of the works Merlin reve
rses
the canvas and shows us the stretchers and supports that are minimally
painted with lovely shapes and incorporating small 3-D elements usually
hovering on the edges and are then covered over with a transparent layer
or scrim giving them a theatrical look as if we are watching a play
that is about to happen. Some of them have nice wooden frames or borders
surrounding them, but most are on canvas with some of them having
concaved sides that give the works a warped eccentric look. One canvas
has a single flower growing out of a vase set on a table that at first I
thought it was a person wearing a weird hat, another is a tangy erotic
almost pornographic painting of a woman, legs spread and hunched on a
table top with an detached erect penis hovering near her vagina like a
space ship about to take off. There are also sublime landscapes with
acidy colors, textured mountains and small marvelous abstractions so
beautifully painted and composed in their small constricted spaces that
they catch you off guard in their perfect splendor. As usual critics
have the need to compare and line up influences when composing their
reviews and articles, “they remind me of this painter and that painter”
and I guess that’s their job, but it’s not mine. I look at other
artist’s art for what is there in front of me (or in many cases what
isn’t there) and with these terrific paintings I simply relish them for
their own being. Why this wonderful painter was not included in Moma’s
lousy “Forever No” fiasco is beyond me, and serves as a reminder of the
many large and small mistakes the curators made in putting that very
flawed show together. I don’t think I’ve been so moved by a group of
paintings since Bill Jensen’s deeply felt incomparable small paintings
of the early 70’s.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home