The Best Exhibitions of 2012
My list of the best
shows that I saw this year is not very large, mainly because I didn’t see that
many shows, or that many shows that I liked. I saw a lot of bad, mediocre or
overrated exhibitions, and there were exhibitions by major artists that were anything
but major. But to be fair It’s difficult to see everything because there is so
much of everything. Also of note were the really terrific works that
passed in front of my eyes this year on Facebook, strong bodies of work by many
of my facebook artist friends were at times more exciting and rewarding than
what I saw in museums and galleries. So in no order of preference is what
I liked in 2012. These reviews originally appeared throughout the year on this
very blog and on facebook.
Jean Dubuffet. Pace
Gallery
Today on my skip to my lou jaunt through Chelsea I took in
the magnificent exhibition Jean Dubuffet: The Last Two Years at The Pace
Gallery. The large and spacious space is filled with about 20 of this art
brute’s paintings that mostly are very large in size consisting mostly of the
colors red, blue yellow and white in abstract swirls and shapes and painted
with acrylics. The sheer beauty of these works, (and they are indeed beautiful)
made me dizzy with pleasure and delight. The guard on duty was eyeing me
weirdly maybe because I had a soft big old smile on my face and was lingering
longer than is usual and that I kept going back and forth between the two
galleries. I’ve always loved this man Dubuffet’s work ever since I was a
teenager. Here was an older artist with a young artist’s daring do, and he
still had this daring & do right up to his death. This is an exhibit that I
might have to go to again before it comes down in March.
Ralph Humphrey. Gary
Snyder Gallery
Chelsea in the rain, saw me taking
in some exhibitions today, and without a doubt the best show on right now is
the stunning Ralph Humphrey exhibition at the Gary Snyder Gallery. I've always
liked his work, big colorful yet subtle with rich sculptural like
textures. His colors are beautiful, very tactile and luscious and they sure
have a presence.
Thomas Hirschhorn. Gladstone Gallery
Also having a presence is the Thomas Hirschhorn spectacular
installation inspired by the sinking of the cruise ship Costa Concordia at the
Gladstone Gallery. You can't help but be amazed at this work, sort of like
being on a movie set but not being allowed to walk around in it, and it does
grab you and as the artist says he wanted to do something big, but big doesn't
always mean good. It does come with the prerequisite wow affect, and it does
startle, but what really are with left with? Maybe just another razzle dazzle
Chelsea installation piece.
The Wedding (the Walker Evans Polaroid Project. Andrea Rosen Gallery
The other show that I liked quite a bit, but with some very
minor reservations was the complex and sometimes daunting The Wedding (The
Walker Evans Polaroid Project) which was curated by Ydessa Hendeles, who calls
it a curatorial composition. This is on view at the Adrea Rosen Gallery only
until Feb. 4th. Hendeles who is also a wealthy collector and curator has
brought together some intriguing objects including 83 of Walker Evans’s last
works that are small color polaroids of buildings and structures + several
photographs by Muybridge, Atget and bird photos by Roni Horn which are of
taxidermied Icelandic wildfowl in close up and from the back. All are installed
on walls that surround the main piece, the focus of the show, a large and
beautiful mid 19th century birdhouse from England which is more like a
playhouse than a refuge for birds. This lovely structure is surround by child’s
settees designed by Stickley at the turn of the 20th Century that invite the
viewer to sit for a while. It all gives the appearance of a stage set waiting
for the play to begin and all told this is indeed an odd and intriguing
installation that some might find dense and pedantic. In fact the gallery has
piled on a counter in the front room small 35pg.very nice Spiral bound catalogs
for the taking in which the curator goes to great lengths to explain the
meanings behind the installation and the objects included written in a clear
and casual text. Also on hand in the foyer of the gallery is an architectural
model of a cooper’s workshop that sits on a Stickely child’s table, all of this
is visually arresting but would this elegant installation work without a 35pg.
Explanation of what we are looking at. The whole thing does have the feeling of
being in a church and in the press release Hendeles writes how she has never
come into the Andrea Rosen Gallery “without feeling the majesty of the
cathedral-like architecture of its main gallery,” a feeling I might say I have
never felt.
mpelling. I should add that he is an old friend, and I had for many years one of his early paintings which I sold in the late 80's, a sad day for me. The piece of mine that Bill had was destroyed in the awful fire in Margrit's loft, another sad day for me.
The Birth Of Promotion. Inventing Film Publicity in The Silent Film Era. New York Public Library for The Performing Arts.
Happenings. The Pace Gallery
m, but later on I would meet some
of these marvelous artists who made up this brief moment in American Art that
would lead to Pop Art, and influence dance, music and poetry. The show is
spiffy and the installation is very impressive, looking like a million bucks,
which I'm sure it came close to costing.
John Chamberlain: Choices. The Guggenheim Museum
raordinary building, only on the ground floor he garbage answered. So I put my camera away and went back to looking at the sculptures, and he had the audacity to tell me I'm not done don't turn your back on me. Can you imagine. At that point I should have gone downstairs and filed a complaint against this little turd. I told him to stop harassing me. Have a good day the prick said. Really.
The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde. The Metropolitan Museum
is included. Interesting
because I never knew this about Matisse. Also of note were the wonderful little
dolls and models that Florine Stettheimer designed for Four Saints In Three
Acts, and photos of the fabulous house that Le Corbusier designed for Sarah
& Michael Stein, also there is short movies of four saints and home movies
of the steins at the Le Corbusier house. At times viewing the show brought
tears to my eyes, that's how moving I found it. The crowds are manageable if
you get there early.
Janet Fish, Charles Burchfield. D.C. Moore Gallery. Tom Friedman. Luhring Augustine Gallery, Milton Avery. Fischbach Gallery. Jonathan Lasker. Cheim & Read
The Janet Fish show at D.C. Moore of still life's are bold and complex in her handling of her paint and her set ups, also in the smaller gallery is a marvelous small show of watercolor Landscapes by the great Charles Burchfield. The Tom Friedman show which closes soon, has some of his wow sculptures. His work usually brings a smile to my face, and although not all of them are successful this is still a very good show. The two shows that I liked the most is the wonderful exhibit of Milton Avery that the painter McWillie Chambers put together for Fischbach Gallery and the really beautiful show of Jonathan Lasker at Cheim & Read. These are "early works" from 1977-1985 and there is not a weak work in the entire exhibition. So there you have it.
Lucio Fontana at the Gagosian Gallery.
This is a superb exhibition of the important Italian artist
who might not be so well known in this country. His most famous works are probably his slashed and lacerated canvases,
and they are well represented here, but there is much more in this marvelous
show. The only things that I didn't care for were the Ambienti Spaziali
which are environments that play with light and which the gallery has lovingly
reconstructed. In order to view them you have to enter small black rooms which
turned me off immediately because of my claustrophobia and my trepidation made
me stay clear of them after I had ventured into one, and besides I haven't been
in any small black rooms since 1984, and I wasn't about to start going into
them at this late date. Otherwise I was completely spellbound by his work and
was surprised by what a wonderful artist he was, because quite frankly I
haven't given Mr. Fontana much thought in all my years as an artist. This is
easily one of the best shows I have seen in 2012.
Bryan Hunt Danese Gallery. Ronnie Bladen. Loretta Howard Gallery, Brice Marden Matthew
Marks Gallery
I went to some galleries today, well more than some, and I wish I could say that I loved everything I saw. I didn’t. In fact I saw very little that I did like. I guess I should start with what I thought was worth my time and maybe yours. The Bryan Hunt show at Danese has some marvelous pieces, beautifully crafted and intriguing. They kinda reminded me a bit of Brancusi which is funny because right before seeing the Hunts I saw a show of photographs by the master. Most of course I had seen before, and I love his work, but as photographs these are basically documentations of his studio and I could just as easily look at them in a book as I could on the white walls of a gallery. Getting back to Hunt, I especially liked the sculptures that he’s call dirigibles and are attached to the walls way above the viewer and seem to float in space. Really nice stuff. The show of Ronnie Bladen’s early paintings from 1955-1962 at the Loretta Howard Gallery (this is fast becoming one of my favorite galleries) is a jolt because he’s known as being a minimalist and these oil paintings are anything but, plus I love the fact that he hid them away for years behind a wall that he built in his studio. These are big and colorful and have enough oil on them to keep the country supplied for the next 100 years. See this show. I also was very much taken with Brice Marden’s new paintings, which are small pieces of marble with oil paint applied to them. They’re as elegant as one would expect from him, but they also took me by surprise, not what I was expecting to see.
Century of the Child: Growing by Design, 1900–2000. The Museum Of Modern Art
I really enjoyed
this exhibition and seeing it at a member’s only showing without the hoards
helped. But that being said I do have my reservations. This being a typical
Moma “historical” show it looks great as it sprawls its way through those large
galleries on the 6th floor. The exhibit documents how children
around the world played and learned from 1900 to 2000. However this being the
Museum Of Modern Art the work is geared to modernism and “good” design, so I
found it to be somewhat narrow and elitist in its approach and curatorial
decisions. Don’t get me wrong I love Lyonel Feininger’s wooden toys as much as
the next artist, and there are many beautiful examples of other toys, books,
furniture and games by other artists, architects and designers but it helps if
one keeps in mind that this is a show for MOMA’s kinder and not for mommy’s
kids. So everything in the show is beautiful and well designed, after all we
know that children only like beautiful and well-designed toys. There is a nod
to the commercial toy which includes colorforms (loved those colorforms as a
kid), Etch A Sketch (loved my Etch A Sketch, but its too much in the news these
days), Lego and slinky but not a can of Play Doh is to be found, nor are
marbles, pick up sticks, Jacks or any toy that one could have purchased at a
Woolworth’s. Most of the toys and games look like they were expensive even when
new, and now they look like the toys that sometimes turn up on Antiques Road
show, you know those great tin cars in their original boxes which is also
represented in the show. But where are the Lionel Train sets, the Lincoln Logs (the
only building block set that turns up is of course very Bauhausy even though it’s
from the 1950’s) or a View Master (would it have killed them to include a
View Master?), and not one doll. The Moma’s idea of a doll is some of Sophie
Taeuber-Arp’s wonderful puppets. There is not one toy from the Disney Empire,
in fact there are no movie or TV tie-in games at all. There is not a ball, or a
cheap beach toy either; in fact games and toys of the streets are completely
left out. Like many of these historical shows, by the time you get to the final
galleries, it’s a big downer, I mean why would the curators devoted an entire
wall pasted with pages from The Whole Earth Catalog along with a poster of the
Mai Lai massacre. Is this to point out and educate us that our childhoods came
to an end with the 60’s? How many small kids are going to have nightmares after
viewing that shocking poster, one woman standing next to me looked visibly
upset and ironically it’s the one image from this exhibition on childhood that stays
with me, its the image that I took home with me. Sure there are other political
images and objects throughout the show. There are some charming Nazi and
Italian Fascist board games (in mint condition I might add), that made me a
little queasy and uncomfortable, but the Moma’s nod to the holocaust and its
children is faint and is pretty much inconsequential consisting of a propaganda
film that the Nazi’s produced to show the world how marvelous the concentration
camp at Terezin was. There are no coloring books nor paper dolls and no Mr. And
Mrs. Potato Head, now that omission really upset me. There are also toys of the
space age, and stuff from Pee-Wee’s Playhouse but the newest toys and games
look so uninviting to me, that I thought to myself what kid would want to play
with them, I certainly wouldn’t and do we really need a wall featuring a boring
photograph by Andreas Gurksy of an ugly suburban Toy’s “R” Us, oh wait of
course its in their collection. Also when you exit through the gift shop you
will be able to pick up nice reproductions of some of the toys and books
featured in the exhibition which makes me wonder what came first the
chicken or the exhibition.
Yayoi Kusama & Signs & Symbols. The Whitney
Museum
Went up to the Whitney Museum today (thankfully the terrible
heat wave broke) to see the Yayoi Kusama show which was pretty much marvelous.
I especially liked seeing her early work, the paintings and drawings. Her
Phallic sculptures or accumulations as she calls them were not my favorites, even though they have a tacky look and feel to them. She is
certainly a unique presence and I applaud the Whitney for mounting this show..
I also liked (what's not to like as my mother use to say) The Signs and Symbols
show that is a beautifully installed exhibit of lots of beautiful paintings
from their collection, its not the kind of show that is going to send you home
thinking, but it did make me swoon a bit and made my knees a little weak.
Art Of Another Kind. The Guggenheim Museum
Just back from seeing this perfect show for a hot summer day.
Filled to the brim with beautiful paintings by a wide range of international
artists some of whom I never heard of ("lesser known" as the
Guggenheim refers to them), and beautifully installed
(large paintings always look great in this place.) All the works were dusted
off and taken out of their permanent collection storage bins, and works that I
liked a lot were by Dubuffet, Rauschenberg, (an early all red abstract collaged
heavily painted painting), Marca-Relli, Burri, Fontana, Klein, Pollock, Hoffman
and many others. The pieces of sculpture scattered about here and there don't
do so well, but thats to be expected, but the early Louise Bourgeois and a few
Noguchi's stood out for me..
Quay Brothers: On Deciphering the Pharmacist's Prescription for Lip-Reading Puppets. The Museum Of Modern Art
Went up to the Moma on Wednesday to view the Quay Brothers
retrospective and I found it pretty charming if not always compelling. I
suppose the attention must be paid factor would depend on ones interest in
animation and Eastern European animation at that. Although the twin brothers
are American having been born in Penn. in 1947 they have lived mainly in
Europe. The boys were influenced by Polish surrealism and animation and those
bold and strange Polish film posters of the 1960's and 70's that I also love.
The tightly installed exhibition is in a small space and is filled with many
screens showing their charming and very odd animated films along with examples
of the work that influenced them. There are lots of examples of their graphic
work including book covers which sort of fade into the air and memory, but the
intricate dioramas that they use in their films are beautiful if somewhat
precious and coying. I once again took advantage of my artist pass which
allowed me to see the show during the members preview and I urge artists to
take advantage of this pass which is $50.00 a year, and a better bargain is not
to be found in all of Manhattan. I've already gotten my money's worth many
times over since I'm there all the time. I practically had the show to myself
and could leisurely look at the exhibit without those annoying hoards of
tourists with their busy little cameras, snapping away at the art, instead of
looking at the art. Me I like taking pictures of them taking pictures and I
sometimes go out of my way to walk in front of them as they click click on
their smart (who says) phones and cameras all the while tweeting away like
annoying flies circling around my head. True I do take snaps of the hubba hubba
men when I can, sometimes its difficult to catch them unaware and sometimes the
hubba hubba guys know that I'm snapping them and pose for me, without posing if
you know what I mean. I can only take this place for short periods of time,
because it sometimes feels like I'm in a large mental hospital with the inmates
running wild or a large airline terminal where all the flights have been
delayed or canceled permanently. This place is sterile and vapid but the
collection when you can actually see it is great, except of course for the
trendy up to the moment Chelsea looking Contemporary Galleries: 1980–Now which
is full of some really dreadful shit.
Leonardo Drew at Sikkema Jenkins & Co. Jackson Pollock
& Tony Smith. Mathew Marks Gallery
Chelsea on a beautiful Fall day. I started the Fall art season by going to many galleries in Chelsea, covering a 3 block stretch. It can get very tiring looking bad art. There was the usual amount of installation art including big gallery spaces thrown into total darkness and featuring dull films and videos with moaning and groaning sounds, a couple of shows featuring accumulation installations (man am I sick of these) where the artists think that I would be intrigued by them putting lots of crap artfully arranged on tables and in little rooms, a show of chairs by one of the most overrated international artists, a dreadful group show that uses books and libraries as a theme, and a couple of painting-sculpture group shows that are hit and miss in terms of quality. However I did really like the massive and very impressive exhibition of sculptures by Leonardo Drew at Sikkema Jenkins & Co. These are huge and I mean huge installations using mostly wood that fill the entire gallery and are not only beautiful but impressively dangerous looking. I also thought the show of early Jackson Pollock and Tony Smith small sculptures at Mathew Marks were nice and organic but if they weren't by them just how interesting would they really be. The large Tony Smith minimal sculpture at another one of Marks' galleries was actually refreshing after all of the junk yard flea market like installations that I saw, and as I turned on to 22st I walked smack into a fashion show letting out and the street was full of models and photographers posing and snapping, and I joined in and took lots of photos also. Who are these people I thought. What fun.
Toxic Beauty: The Art Of Frank Moore. Grey Art Gallery NYU.
I saw the Frank Moore show at The
Grey Art Gallery today, and I found it very good, and intriguing. I
wasn't so familiar with his work, maybe that had to do with me shutting down
during the 80's because of the stress and strain I was going through
from the AIDS epidemic. I lost many people, including my best friend so the New
York art world was not on my short list of what needed my attention. These
paintings are at first glance quite cheerful colorful, clever and bouncy. Its
only until you get close and start looking intently do you see the anger and
sadness that Moore who died of AIDS brought to his work. They are still very
appealing and beautiful, lushly painted and put together with elaborate frames
that become part of the work in themselves. The imagery is crowded and surreal,
figurative and fantastic, pop and bucolic, referential and vastly imaginative.
Moore was aware. He was aware of the harshness of the politic scene that
ignored this disease for so long and like many other artists he brought his
illness into his art. He was also concerned about our environment and the
horrors we were and still are doing to it. His was a heavy palette. His work
should startle and appeal to everyone regardless of gender or sexual
orientation, but for this gay man, viewing this show was like a slap to my
face.
Tatzu Nishi Discovering Columbus. Columbus Circle
Scooter LaForge Munch Gallery
The first thing I noticed about these works, these densely
packed and colorful paintings is how much I was smiling as I took them in. They
are charming works to be sure, in fact I thought they were going to jump off
the walls and start hugging me, that’s how tender they are. But they are also
scary, like childhood nightmares where creatures and animals jump out at you
ready to huff and puff and blow your house down. These are fractured fairy
tales for adults (but they also appeal I would think to children). His
paintings in the show (and in general) are full of so much outstretched and
hidden psychological and personal meanings and feelings that I could only begin
to take it all in on one initial viewing. They are also sexual and gay, comical
and pop and very much in your face. Some
of the paintings have stuff attached to them, and there is an abundance of
themes and images that make many appearances in his fantastic world. Bears, and cats are favorites of his (one
painting has a mommy cat spanking her kitten while he watches a R rates movie
on an old fashioned Tv.) In fact his work in general is usually full of animals
some with two heads and some just floating around and about, Mary’s little lamb
and skeletons and clowns walking through landscapes full of Ensor like people
staring at us are also favorite motifs of his. His colors are lush and generous,
thickly painted and bright. These are on the edge outlaw paintings, Very East
Village other, but also fashionable in the sense that LaForge also decorates
tee shirts and clothes and loves to pose for photographers usually nude or semi
nude. His show runs through Dec. 2.
George Bellows at the Met.
There once was an artist named Bellows who died very young
poor fellow. Bellows who died at the young age of 42 from a ruptured appendix
is now the subject of a large leisurely paced and nicely installed retrospective
at the Met and has enough marvelous paintings in it, to make it worth a look
for anyone interested in American painting at the beginning of the 20th
Century. Granted for me the most wonderful works are in the early galleries
where Bellows taking the advice of his teacher Robert Henri painted scenes of
everyday life in Manhattan. Some of these were rowdy and kinetic with a lush
and expressionistic handling of his paint. His boxing paintings from this
period are probably his most famous and best known works presenting the viewer
with violent images of fighters going at each other while scary looking
aficionados of the sport look on. These works are still an influence today,
just take a look at the poster for the recent revival of “Golden Boy”. Also
strong are his early portraits of everyday people and his portrait of Paddy
Flannigan a street kid bearing his chest and buck teeth is superb, moving and memorable. Also terrific are his large
canvases of street kids many of them swimming nude in the murky waters of the
East River and his street scenes especially “Cave Dwellers” that was painted
almost 100 years ago, and is teeming with color and crowded city life. Bellows
was part of the Ashcan school whose work was shocking in its day because of the
raw look at New York City life that the artists showed, yet his work was also
accepted and rewarded. I must admit that the later galleries which include many
bucolic landscapes and stiff and stilted portraits of family and friends didn’t
impress me all that much There is also a gallery devoted to large paintings
that he did in response to the rumors about German atrocities to the people of
Belgium in World War I that work more as propaganda than as singular works of
art. The exhibition ends with his last boxing painting the wonderful Dempsey
and Firpo that has always been a favorite of mine and it marked a change in his
painting style with the promise of great things to come.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home