My final film review of 2012 Django Unchained
Set in the deep south in 1858 Quentin Tarantino’a audacious, bold and very entertaining nearly 3
hour opus is ostensibly about
one of the most horrible periods in the country’s history. The story is pretty
simple. A slave on his way to be sold meets up one dark and dreary night with a
bounty hunter who is looking for three fugitives from the law. The bounty
hunter knows of a slave who can identify
them and this turns out to be Django who he ingeniously and violently sets free. This sets the film in motion
and the two join ranks and set off on a picaresque
journey through the nightmare landscape that was the deep south two years
before the Civil War. The slave Django very well played by a compelling and
charismatic Jamie Foxx also has an agenda of his own, to find his beautiful
wife who was taken from him and sold to one of the meanest slave owners in the
history of mean slave owners. Django is treated with kindness and respect by
the German bounty hunter, who also has
his own agenda up his sleeves (his
nationally proves important to the plot) played by Christoph Waltz who is
simply fantastic and gives a rich and complex performance that even tops his
Oscar winning role in “Inglorious Bastards”. On their very perilous and nerve
wracking journey they meet up with lots of horrible people who are mostly white
but also a few blacks. The worst of the lot (and that’s saying a lot) is the
very horrible plantation owner Calvin Candie played by Leonardo DiCaprio who
gives one of his best performances in a long time. He’s the linchpin
of the story and lives on a spacious plantation named Candyland with his
sister from hell. It is here that Django’s wife is being kept in slavery and it
is here in Candyland that as the saying goes “the shit hits the fan.” Also
living there is the head house slave an Uncle Tom who makes Simon Legree look like a pussycat, and is played with a terrible meanness
by Samuel L Jackson made up to look old. This is a twist and a nasty one at
that in the story. There is much graphic violence in the film, after all one of
the themes of the film is revenge and a lot of the violence is done in a Looney
Tunes cartoony way, but this doesn’t lessen the horror of it, there is also a
lot of realistic mayhem throughout, this
is after all a Quentin Tarantino film, and as usual with his films might not be
for everyone. There is also a lot of humor and I mean the laughing out loud
kind, what my mother use to call laughing on the other side of your face. Tarintino has always been a referential
director and he brings his love of Spaghetti Westerns into this film about
slavery and revenge in style, plot and music. The film is causing a lot of
controversy some of it because of the generous and some might say overuse of
the N word, but as ugly as the word is it was part of this culture that Tarantino
is showing us, and how often do we hear teenagers today throwing this word out
at each other in a matter- of- fact way. Others are wrongly calling it racist,
and this is from people who have not even seen the film. The movie is rooted in film history, in genre and sub- genre if you like, and I might
be projecting but I could see Tarantino
thinking about taking some American History and mixing it up with the sub-
genre of the spaghetti western. Is it a great film? I really can’t answer that
yet, I have to let it sit with me for a while but I did love it and left the
theatre feeling exhilarated, that I had finally seen something this year really
worthwhile by one of the great artists of contemporary cinema. One of the best
films of 2012.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home